医者 - Doctor

8:49 PM Unknown 2 Comments



We’re done with week 2 of Maus, and increasingly, I am of the opinion that we have been overanalyzing it.
“Why is Maus split into different panels, and not one large image, class?”
I think when Ms. Valentino asked that, I came close to rolling my eyes and muttering “because that’s how comics are” under my breath. On second thought, I think I might actually have done it.
Many of the things that we talked about, we started off with “well, I think Art meant this when he drew Maus this way,” and each time, I would think “NO! He just accidentally did it that way for no particular reason!” I was, and still am, absolutely certain that Art, or any author/artist/composer for that matter, didn't purposely place deep analysis provokers into his work – it just turned out that way, and we 11 AP students, hungry to take a nice participation grade back to our parents, grasped at every small unintentional detail we could get our hands on.
But then again, that’s why English is so interesting. That we can create something out of the nothing that was meant to be there – there’s magic in that, I think. Art claims that “reality is too complex for comics” (Maus II), and maybe that’s the case. Maybe we use comics, or just literature and art in general, as a coping mechanism. We have to dumb reality down, simplify it, before we can dig into it and try to analyze our own lives. Maybe English is actually secretly a branch of the medical field, dedicated to finding a cure to the as yet unnamed I-can’t-make-sense-of-the-world illness. English majors are actually doctors.
So maybe Art used Maus as a coping mechanism as well. He had “some kind of guilt” about not having lived through Auschwitz (Maus II), so he needed to relieve himself of that guilt by reliving it through his father’s memories. That would be all fine and dandy if he kept it to himself, but then he presumptuously decided that he needed to relieve the world of the same guilt, too, and immortalized Vladek’s memories into Maus for the whole world to suffer. Including 11 AP students.
And there I go, committing the exact crime I call absolutely ridiculous. I guess it’s necessary, the innate function of humankind to overanalyze simple things in order to simplify their complicated lives. Art was right; reality is too complex.
Art diagnising himself with his fancy doctor abilities in Maus II.

2 comments:

  1. Haha I feel you on the overanalyzing! I believe authors do, to some extent, put thought into the rhetorical devices they use to prove a point, but I doubt they spend days thinking about what message readers will get when they see an em dash used versus a semicolon (and no, the syntax of this extremely long sentence doesn’t mean anything—at least, nothing that I can think of).

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel man..I feel, but it is interesting to think that we can discuss and expand of something the author didn't even intend to for a good solid 15 minutes or how we can pick out how their pieces of clothing represent the american dream. ;) I love how you tied in your stance on overanalyzing into the quote and yes...reality is too complex sometimes.

    ReplyDelete

Powered by Blogger.